MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3015996688

Trastorno Neurocognitivo Leve en el Climaterio con Evaluación Cognitiva Montreal

2018· article· es· W3015996688 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
María de Lourdes Dorador González, Gabriela Orozco-Calderón

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista chilena de neuropsicología · 2018
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldNeuroscience
TopicStress Responses and Cortisol
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClimactericHumanitiesGynecologyMedicinePsychologyMenopausePhilosophyEndocrinology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

espanolLas mujeres en climaterio o transicion menopausica frecuentemente reportan quejas de memoria. El Estudio Esmeralda busca relacionar los Sintomas del Climaterio (SC) femenino en sus diferentes etapas: premenopausia (etapa -2, temprana de la transicion menopausica), perimenopausia (etapas -1 y +1a, tardia de la transicion menopausica y temprana de postmenopausia) y postmenopausia (etapas +1b, +1c y +2, temprana de postmenopausia con tardia de postmenopausia), con posible deterioro del funcionamiento intelectual, que pudiera llevar a sospechar de Trastorno Neurocognitivo leve (TNCl). La muestra final quedo conformada por 100 mujeres con alto nivel de escolaridad entre 40 y 60 anos de edad. Se realizo un estudio no experimental transversal con muestreo no probabilistico, utilizando la Evaluacion Cognitiva Montreal (MoCA). Se obtuvieron resultados normativos en 43.27% de la muestra y Deterioro Cognitivo Leve (DCL) en 56.73%, encontrando diferencia de medias significativas al nivel 0.05 en las tres etapas de climaterio, resultando la mayor incidencia en perimenopausia, etapa de mayor disminucion de estrogenos. Se concluye que cambios en la funcion intelectual, pueden estar asociados a variacion hormonal. Se puede determinar TNCl en forma temprana, en busca de una atencion primaria y puesta en marcha de reactivacion de funciones intelectuales EnglishWomen in the climacteric stage or menopausal transition, frequently report complaint in memory. Emerald Study search relate feminine climacteric syndrome in their different steps: premenopause (stage -2 early menopausal transition), perimenopause (stages -1 and +1a late menopausal transition and early postmenopause) and postmenopause (stages +1b, +1 c and +2 early postmenopause with late postmenopause), with a possible mild cognitive impairment, that carry on suspect of Mild Neurocognitve Disorder (mNCD). The final sample were 100 women with high schooling level between 40 and 60 years old. A nonexperimental, non-probability cross-sectional study was conducted through the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Normative results were obtained in 43.27% and mNCD in 56.73%, finding difference of significant means at the 0.05 level in the three stages of climacteric, resulting in the highest incidence in perimenopause, stage of greatest decrease in estrogen. It is concluded that changes in intellectual function may be associated with hormonal variation. mNCD can be determined early, in search of primary care and start-up of reactivation of intellectual functions

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.298
Threshold uncertainty score0.593

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista chilena de neuropsicología→Same topicStress Responses and Cortisol→French-language works237,207→