MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3016003143 · doi:10.15407/kvt199.01.019

The Use of Complexity and Variability Characteristics for the Analysis of Complex Dynamic Systems

2020· article· en· W3016003143 on OpenAlexaff
Oksana Biloshytska, I. Nastenko, Vladimir Pavlov

Bibliographic record

VenueCybernetics and computer engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicChaos control and synchronization
Canadian institutionsCybernet Systems Corporation (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComplex systemBiological systemBiologyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction.The normal dynamics of a healthy organism is chaotic and the observed "chaos" is inherent in the very nature of the dynamic processes taking place in the organism and the degree of chaotic of these processes may vary in case of pathology in one direction or another.The electrical activity of the brain is also characterized by signs of deterministic chaos, and changes in parameters of its nonlinear dynamics testify to the characteristic changes in brain functioning.The problem of diagnostics and identification of the moment preceding an epileptic seizure or other periods of brain functioning in epileptic patients is not only a problem of choosing a classification method but also of determining quantitative estimates of dynamics reflecting the complexity and variability of the Electroencephalography (EEG) signal.The purpose of the paper is to form an effective ensemble of features from the characteristics reflecting the complexity and variability of the EEG signal,to construct the prognostic models for the course of epilepsy and to develop the information technology to support diagnostic decision-making based on them.Methods.The methods of mathematical statistics for the processing of diagnostic information, the methods of mathematical modeling (stepwise logistic regression) -for the construction of prognostic models for estimating the course of epilepsy were used; methodological bases for the creation of information technology for the diagnosis of epilepsy according to the EEG. Results.Changes in indicators such as Hurst Index, fractal dimension, logistic mapping, and algorithmic signal complexity have been investigated.The mathematical models © BILOSHYTSKA O.K., NASTENKO Ie.A., PAVLOV V.A., 2020 include variables that are calculated from the EEG data and are available during patient observation.As a result of the application of step-by-step algorithms, the most informative features are included in the models.The selected features allow for the most accurate identification of individual periods of epilepsy flow from the EEG data.It has been established that the use of a decision support system increases the reliability of determining the periods of an epileptic seizure (conditional norm, before, during and after an attack) by an average of 6.6% for children and 8% for adults.Conclusions.The proposed prognostic models allow to obtain additional information about the periods of epileptic seizures and to predict their onset in time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCybernetics and computer engineeringSame topicChaos control and synchronizationFrench-language works237,207