MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3016017258 · doi:10.1364/boe.390100

Photonic Bragg waveguide platform for multichannel resonant sensing applications in the THz range

2020· article· en· W3016017258 on OpenAlexafffund
Jingwen Li, Hang Qu, Jicheng Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomedical Optics Express · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaPolytechnique Montréal
KeywordsWaveguideOpticsFiber Bragg gratingMaterials scienceTerahertz radiationDistributed Bragg reflectorOptoelectronicsPhotonicsPhysicsWavelength

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we study a photonic Bragg waveguide sensor for resonant sensing applications in the THz range. In order to enhance the resolution and detectivity of the sensor, we modify the relatively broad transmission spectrum of the Bragg waveguide with spectrally narrow transmission dips by creating a geometrical defect in Bragg reflector and causing anti-crossing phenomenon between the core-guided mode and defect mode. The spectral position of the resonant dip is highly sensitive to the thickness variation in the vicinity of the waveguide core. By designing and manufacturing a Bragg waveguide which includes several sections with different defect layer thicknesses, we can interrogate more than one sample simultaneously and thereby realize multichannel resonant sensing by directly tracking the independent resonant dips. Furthermore, we demonstrate the waveguide platform for online monitoring of the thickness variation of lactose powders, which is captured on the waveguide core via a centrifugal force using a home-built rotating setup. Additionally, we also demonstrate the waveguide for fingerprint detection of powder analytes, which further enriches the sensing scenario of the sensing platform. Finally, we discuss the advantages and the spectral tailoring flexibility of the THz Bragg waveguides sensors for future implementations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.861
Threshold uncertainty score0.497

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiomedical Optics ExpressSame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207