Evaluation of inverse methods for estimation of mechanical parameters in solid tumors
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To treat cancer, knowledge of mechanical parameters can be essential. This study proposes a new approach for estimating hydraulic conductivity (k) and hydraulic conductivity ratio (α) of a living tissue, based on inverse methods, allowing tissue parameter estimation using only a limited set of measurements. First, two population-based algorithms (Levenberg-Marquardt (LM) method and conjugate gradient (CG) method) and two gradient-based algorithms (genetic algorithm (GA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm) are considered, and a comparative study between these different inverse methods is performed to determine which methods have a good performance in terms of convergence rate and stability. CG method is shown to perform well in the case of noise-free input data; however, in the case of noisy input data, it fails to converge. The other three methods (LM, GA, and PSO) converge with estimation errors <10% in both noise-free and noisy input data, suggesting their utility to tackle this problem. In the second part, the effectiveness and good accuracy of these robust algorithms (LM, GA, and PSO) are validated with experimental results. The hydraulic conductivity and hydraulic conductivity ratio of a specific living tumor tissue are then estimated for mammary adenocarcinoma (R3230AC). Moreover, assuming measurement of only one-point interstitial pressure inside the tumor, the effect of the location of this one-point on estimation accuracy of hydraulic conductivity is investigated. We show that estimation errors for points measured near the surface and center of the tumor are greater than at other points.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it