Justin Podur, La nouvelle dictature d’Haïti. Coup d’État, séisme et occupation onusienne. Écosociété, 2016
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ne vous laissez pas tromper par le sous-titre de cet ouvrage : Justin Podur, enseignant canadien qui n’a passe que quelques semaines en Haiti, n’ecrit guere sur le seisme. En revanche, resolument pro-Aristide (le controverse president haitien en 1991, puis de 1994 a 1996), il relate dans La nouvelle dictature d’Haiti le « coup d’Etat » qui l’a renverse et l’installation de ce que l’auteur appelle une « dictature internationalisee » dans le pays. Une « nouvelle dictature » qui n’est jamais definie, faite de « l’occupation onusienne », de l’obscure et malfaisante « communaute internationale » et de la presence d’ONG forcement a la botte des Etats qui les financent. L’eventualite de l’independance de ces ONG n’est d’ailleurs jamais envisagee dans l’ouvrage, ni celle des medias, toujours manipulables et credules, l’auteur se gardant egalement d’evoquer les failles d’Aristide ou les « chimeres », les milices qu’il financait pour mettre en œuvre son pouvoir.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".