MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3016084871 · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.00109

Half of Prescribed Antibiotics Are Not Needed: A Pharmacist-Led Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention and Clinical Outcomes in a Referral Hospital in Ethiopia

2020· article· en· W3016084871 on OpenAlexaff
Gebremedhin Beedemariam Gebretekle, Damen Haile Mariam, Kefyalew Taye, Atalay Mulu Fentie, Wondwossen Amogne Degu, Tinsae Alemayehu, Temesgen Beyene, Michael Libman, Teferi Gedif Fenta, Cédric P. Yansouni, Makeda Semret

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Public Health · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicAntibiotic Use and Resistance
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAntimicrobial stewardshipMedical prescriptionPsychological interventionCefepimeClinical pharmacyIntervention (counseling)PharmacistAuditEmergency medicineAntibioticsIntensive care medicinePediatricsFamily medicineAntibiotic resistancePharmacyNursingImipenem

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intense antibiotic consumption in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) is fueled by critical gaps in diagnostics and entrenched syndromic management of infectious syndromes. Few data inform the achievability and impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa. Our goal was to demonstrate the feasibility of a pharmacist-led laboratory-supported intervention at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, and report on antimicrobial use and clinical outcomes associated with the intervention. This was a single-center quasi-experimental study conducted in two phases: (i) an intervention phase (November 2017 to August 2018), during which we implemented weekly audit and immediate feedback on antibiotic prescriptions of patients admitted in 2 pediatric and 2 adult medicine wards, and (ii) a post-intervention phase (September 2018 to January 2019) during which we audited prescriptions but provided no feedback to the treating teams. The intervention was conducted by an AMS team consisting of 4 clinical pharmacists and one ID specialist. Our primary outcome was antimicrobial utilization (days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 patient-days and duration of antibiotic treatment courses); secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay (LOS) and in-hospital all-cause mortality. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to explore factors associated with all-cause in-hospital mortality. We collected data on 1,109 individual patients (707 during intervention, 402 post-intervention). Ceftriaxone, vancomycin, cefepime, and meropenem were the most commonly prescribed antibiotics; 96% of the AMS team's recommendations were accepted. We recommended to discontinue antibiotics in 54% of cases. Once the intervention ceased, total antimicrobial use increased by 51.6% and mean duration of treatment by 4.1 days/patient. Mean LOS and crude mortality increased significantly post-intervention (LOS: 19.8 vs 24.1 days; mortality 6.9% vs 14.7%). These differences remained significant after adjusting for potential confounders. A pharmacist-led AMS intervention focused on duration of antibiotic treatment was feasible with good acceptability in our setting. Cessation of audit-feedback activities was associated with immediate and sustained increase in antibiotic consumption, reflecting a rapid return to baseline (pre-intervention) prescribing practices, and worse clinical outcomes. Audit-feedback activities can effectively reduce antimicrobial consumption and result in better outcomes, but require organizational leadership’s commitment for sustainable benefits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations60
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Public HealthSame topicAntibiotic Use and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207