MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3016128481 · doi:10.1002/eem2.12080

ZnO Interface Modified LiNi<sub>0.6</sub>Co<sub>0.2</sub>Mn<sub>0.2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> Toward Boosting Lithium Storage

2020· article· en· W3016128481 on OpenAlexaff
Yunyan Li, Xifei Li, Junhua Hu, Wen Liu, Hirbod Maleki Kheimeh Sari, Dejun Li, Qian Sun, Liang Kou, Zhanyuan Tian, Le Shao, Cheng Zhang, Jiujun Zhang, Xueliang Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & environment materials · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDielectric spectroscopyMaterials scienceCyclic voltammetryAmorphous solidCathodeElectrochemistryLithium (medication)Boosting (machine learning)IonChemical engineeringSol-gelCoatingAnalytical Chemistry (journal)NanotechnologyElectrodeChemistryCrystallographyChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, an amorphous ZnO was coated on LiNi0.6Co0.2Mn0.2O2 (NCM) using a sol‐gel strategy method. The NCM coated with 1 wt.% ZnO and a thickness of about 3 nm exhibits an improved cycling performance, accompanied by a lower capacity fading (from 194.8 to 133.8 mAh g−1, i.e., 68%) than that of the pristine one (i.e., only 34%) after 300 cycles at 0.2 C. The cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) indicate that the ZnO coating can improve extraction/insertion of Li+ and inhibit the increase in impedance of the NCM cathode material. This approach may benefit the performance improvement of the Ni‐rich cathode materials in Lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & environment materialsSame topicAdvancements in Battery MaterialsFrench-language works237,207