MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3016275841 · doi:10.1063/1.5144838

Strain-free ultrathin AlN epilayers grown directly on sapphire by high-temperature molecular beam epitaxy

2020· article· en· W3016275841 on OpenAlexafffund
David Laleyan, Natalia Fernández‐Delgado, Eric Reid, Ping Wang, Ayush Pandey, Gianluigi A. Botton, Zetian Mi

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGaN-based semiconductor devices and materials
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityCanadian Light Source (Canada)
FundersArmy Research OfficeNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaConsejería de Economía, Innovación, Ciencia y Empleo, Junta de Andalucía
KeywordsSapphireMolecular beam epitaxyMaterials sciencePhotoluminescenceEpitaxyTransmission electron microscopyAnnealing (glass)OptoelectronicsLuminescenceCrystallographyDiffractionOpticsNanotechnologyLayer (electronics)ChemistryComposite materialLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-quality AlN ultrathin films on sapphire substrate were grown by molecular beam epitaxy using an in situ high-temperature annealing approach. From transmission electron microscopy studies, it was found that the AlN epilayers are strain relaxed within the first nm, thus growing nearly strain free. Many of the dislocations generated at the AlN/sapphire interface are reduced within the first 50 nm of growth. Epitaxial films grown directly on sapphire, which are ∼100 nm thick, show X-ray diffraction (002) and (102) rocking curve peaks with full widths at half maximum of less than 150 and 1400 arc sec, respectively, which are the narrowest linewidths reported for AlN of this thickness. Detailed photoluminescence studies further showed that such AlN epilayers exhibit relatively high luminescence efficiency and strong near-band edge emission without defect-related transitions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topicGaN-based semiconductor devices and materialsFrench-language works237,207