Investigating How Boundary Genes Control Abcission in Arabidopsis Thaliana
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The shedding, or abscission, of plant organs occurs in four stages at specialized junctions in the plant called abscission zones (AZs).Premature abscission can pose a problem for farmers by reducing crop yield.Studies in Arabidopsis thaliana have identified organ boundary genes BLADE-ON-PETIOLE1/2 (BOP1/2) as essential for the formation of AZs.However, downstream effectors of BOP1/2 in this process are unknown.To execute developmental programs in inflorescences, BOP1/2 require TGA basic leucine zipper transcription factors for recruitment to DNA and TALE homeodomain proteins ATH1 and KNAT6 for boundary patterning.How these factors contribute to abscission is unclear.Here, I show that TGA and TALE transcription factors contribute to BOP-dependent formation of AZs.I also begin to explore a role for this module in organ separation.Collectively, my work reveals a role for boundary genes at different steps of abscission for potential application in crops.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".