Potato Late Blight Detection at the Leaf and Canopy Levels Based in the Red and Red-Edge Spectral Regions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Potato late blight, caused by Phytophthora infestans, is a major disease worldwide that has a significant economic impact on potato crops, and remote sensing might help to detect the disease in early stages. This study aims to determine changes induced by potato late blight in two parameters of the red and red-edge spectral regions: the red-well point (RWP) and the red-edge point (REP) as a function of the number of days post-inoculation (DPI) at the leaf and canopy levels. The RWP or REP variations were modelled using linear or exponential regression models as a function of the DPI. A Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithm was used to classify healthy and infected leaves or plants using either the RWP or REP wavelength as well as the reflectances at 668, 705, 717 and 740 nm. Higher variations in the RWP and REP wavelengths were observed for the infected leaves compared to healthy leaves. The linear and exponential models resulted in higher adjusted R2 for the infected case than for the healthy case. The SVM classifier applied to the reflectance of the red and red-edge bands of the Micasense® Dual-X camera was able to sort healthy and infected cases with both the leaf and canopy measurements, reaching an overall classification accuracy of 89.33% at 3 DPI when symptoms were visible for the first time with the leaf measurements and of 89.06% at 5 DPI, i.e., two days after the symptoms became apparent, with the canopy measurements. The study shows that RWP and REP at leaf and canopy levels allow detecting potato late blight, but these parameters are less efficient to sort healthy and infected leaves or plants than the reflectance at 668, 705, 717 and 740 nm. Future research should consider larger samples, other cultivars and the test of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery for field-based detection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".