ELEIÇÕES DO QUÉBEC NAS CAPAS DE LE JOURNAL DE MONTRÉAL E LA PRESSE: 2008, 2012 E 2014
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artigo examina a visibilidade dos atores políticos na cobertura jornalística das eleições do Quebec de 2008 a 2014. Analisamos notícias de Le Journal de Montréal e La Presse publicadas nos 20 dias anteriores aos 20 dias seguintes às votações. Descobrimos que chefes têm mais muito mais visibilidade que demais atores; o ranking de visibilidade espelhou o resultado das urnas.
 
 This article examines the visibility of political actors in news coverage of the Quebec elections from 2008 to 2014. We analyzed texts from Le Journal de Montréal and La Presse published from 20 days preceding to 20 days following the polls. We found that leaders are much more visible than other actors; the visibility ranking mirrored elections outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it