MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Acute Reduction of Ambient Air Pressure Enhances Arterial Vasodilation in Murine Resistance Arteries Independently of Endothelial Factors

2016· article· en· W3016397450 on OpenAlexaff
Anmol Shahid, Jude S. Morton, Sandra T. Davidge, M. Sean McMurtry

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyographVasodilationMedicineInternal medicineBlood pressureCardiologyPulse pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Epidemiological studies have found populations living at higher elevations are at lower risk for acute myocardial infarction (MI) than those at lower elevations, even after adjustments for confounders. The mechanism for this observation is not known. Since atmospheric air pressure varies inversely with elevation, and air pressure exerts compressive force on vascular structures, reduced compressive force on arteries due to elevation‐related reductions in atmospheric pressure might alter arterial function. This could be a potential mechanism. We hypothesized that acute exposure to lower air pressure will dilate arteries and increase arterial vasodilation to reduce peripheral vascular resistance. Methods Second order mesenteric arteries (n=7) were isolated from C57BL/6 male mice (n=7, age 3.2±0.9 months) and perfused with Ca2 + ‐free saline solution to assess passive properties of the vessels in a pressure myograph. This system was placed in a custom‐designed hypobaric chamber and arterial function was studied ex‐vivo at acute exposure to three barometric pressure steps: 754 mmHg (room pressure or control), 714 mmHg (p1) and 674 mmHg (p2). Active vessel responses in the presence of L‐NAME, a nitric oxide inhibitor, and Meclofenamate, a cyclooxygenase inhibitor, were assessed with mechanical manipulation of perfusion pressure (4–140 mmHg) or flow rate (0–70 μL/min). Lumen diameter was measured using a micrometer, with manometers for measurement of pressure drop across the vessel. Results Under static conditions, vessel diameters at p1 and p2 increased by 20.9±9.3% and 28.2±8.6% compared to baseline diameter at room pressure (p<0.01 vs. control for p1 and p2). Flow‐mediated vasodilation contributed little additional dilation. At a fixed flow rate of 70 μLmin −1 , vessels reached maximum diameters of 108.6 ±13.6μm at p1 and 120.5±13.0 at p2 versus 106.0±4.0 μm for the control condition. This observed vasodilation was not diminished in the presence of L‐NAME and Meclofenamate. Vascular resistance was significantly reduced at p2 compared to control (2.14±0.60 mmHg*min/μL vs. 3.21±0.49 mmHg*min/μL, p < 0.05). Conclusion We conclude that acute exposure to reduced barometric pressure increases artery diameter and decreases resistance across vessels ex‐vivo in an endothelium‐independent manner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicClimate Change and Health Impacts→French-language works237,207→