MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3016424454 · doi:10.1109/tpel.2020.2987828

A Novel High-Performance Predictive Control Formulation for Multilevel Inverters

2020· article· en· W3016424454 on OpenAlexafffund
Zhituo Ni, Ahmed Abuelnaga, Mehdi Narimani

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsModel predictive controlWeightingConvertersNetwork topologyControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceEngineeringControl (management)Voltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article proposes a novel high-performance predictive control with long prediction horizons to improve the control performance of the multilevel inverters. The finite control set model predictive control (FCS-MPC) has obtained a lot of attention for power converters due to its advantages of high dynamic performance, multi objective capability, no need for PI regulators and PWM modulators. However, the MPC method requires a high number of computations especially for higher-level power converter topologies due to the existence of a huge amount of switching combinations and redundancies. Real-time searching for the optimal switching state among a large candidate pool at a high sampling rate is sometimes impossible with the standard commercial processors. This limitation also prevents real-time implementation of an MPC for multilevel converters with step prediction more than one. To solve the aforementioned issues, this paper presents a novel high-performance FCS-MPC scheme. The proposed FCS-MPC is reformulated mathematically MPC approach to an l <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> norm optimization problem, which can be solved on-line through matrix theory. Compared with the existing MPC optimization algorithms, the proposed MPC formulation has the advantage of a substantial reduction in computational burden, no need for the weighting factors or cost functions, and thus can operate at long horizon prediction length. The proposed method is verified experimentally on a seven-level CHB inverter prototype with a three-step prediction length to demonstrate the ability and performance of the proposed method for multilevel inverters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power ElectronicsSame topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207