MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3016463872 · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102770

Sedating ventilated COVID-19 patients with inhalational anesthetic drugs

2020· letter· en· W3016463872 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Beverley A. Orser, Dian-Shi Wang, Wei‐Yang Lu

Bibliographic record

VenueEBioMedicine · 2020
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoWestern UniversitySunnybrook Health Science Centre
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicinePropofolMidazolamAnesthesiaMechanical ventilationAnestheticDexmedetomidinePneumoniaSedationHypoxemiaIntensive care medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most patients with COVID-19 exhibit mild to moderate respiratory symptoms; however, some develop severe pneumonia and hypoxemia is a frequent cause of death. Severely ill COVID-19 patients often require endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. The choice of drugs to sedate these patients differs widely depending on drug availability and clinical expertise. We suggest that care providers with the appropriate clinical expertise, consider the use of inhalational anesthetic drugs, such as sevoflurane and isoflurane for the following reasons. Intensivists and anesthesiologists are teaming up to treat the sickest COVID-19 patients. They have reported that ventilated COVID-19 patients often require high doses of intravenous sedative drugs such as propofol, midazolam, ketamine and dexmedetomidine. Not surprisingly, there is a growing shortage of these drugs. Also, studies of patients with severe lung injury from causes other than COVID-19 have shown that inhalational anesthetic drugs improve oxygenation and lower mortality when compared with propofol or midazolam [[1]Jabaudon M. Boucher P. Imhoff E. Chabanne R. Faure J.S. Roszyk L. et al.Sevoflurane for sedation in acute respiratory distress syndrome. A randomized controlled pilot study.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017; 195: 792-800Crossref PubMed Scopus (99) Google Scholar]. The severity of lung injury in COVID-19 patients correlates with levels of cytokines and viral load. Convincing preclinical data from others and us have shown that inhalational anesthetic drugs attenuate lung inflammation and dilate airways [[2]Forkuo G.S. Nieman A.N. Kodali R. Zahn N.M. Li G. Rashid Roni M.S. et al.A novel orally available asthma drug candidate that reduces smooth muscle constriction and inflammation by targeting GABAA receptors in the lung.Mol Pharm. 2018; 15: 1766-1777Crossref PubMed Scopus (27) Google Scholar,[3]Fortis S. Spieth P.M. Lu W.Y. Parotto M. Haitsma J.J. Slutsky A.S. et al.Effects of anesthetic regimes on inflammatory responses in a rat model of acute lung injury.Intensive Care Med. 2012; 38: 1548-1555Crossref PubMed Scopus (48) Google Scholar]. These effects are mediated by γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptors, which are expressed in different types of cells in the lung. Stimulating GABAA receptors in lung epithelial cells reduces the production of proinflammatory cytokines; whereas activating GABAA receptors in airway smooth muscle cells stimulates bronchodilation and improves oxygenation [[2]Forkuo G.S. Nieman A.N. Kodali R. Zahn N.M. Li G. Rashid Roni M.S. et al.A novel orally available asthma drug candidate that reduces smooth muscle constriction and inflammation by targeting GABAA receptors in the lung.Mol Pharm. 2018; 15: 1766-1777Crossref PubMed Scopus (27) Google Scholar,[3]Fortis S. Spieth P.M. Lu W.Y. Parotto M. Haitsma J.J. Slutsky A.S. et al.Effects of anesthetic regimes on inflammatory responses in a rat model of acute lung injury.Intensive Care Med. 2012; 38: 1548-1555Crossref PubMed Scopus (48) Google Scholar]. The use of inhalational anesthetic drugs for ventilated COVID-19 patients is both practical and cost effective in low- and high-income countries. These drugs allow sedation levels to be closely and rapidly controlled [[4]Jerath A. Parotto M. Wasowicz M. Ferguson N.D. Volatile anesthetics. Is a new player emerging in critical care sedation?.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016; 193: 1202-1212Crossref PubMed Scopus (58) Google Scholar]; and drug administration does not require electronic infusion pumps, which are in short supply. Conventionally, anesthetic drug delivery units and gas scavenging systems that reduce atmospheric pollution are not available in most critical care units. However, operating rooms which contain the equipment, are being converted into critical care units and anesthetic gas machines are being used as ICU ventilators during the surge of COVID-19 cases [[5]American Society of Anesthesiologists, Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation. APSF/ASA guidance on purposing anesthesia machines as ICU ventilators. https://wwwasahqorg/in-the-spotlight/coronavirus-covid-19-information/purposing-anesthesia-machines-for-ventilators (Accessed April 2020).Google Scholar]. In non-operating room settings, less conventional devices including the AnaConDa system can be used to administer the drugs. Care providers must exercise caution and consult with anesthesiologists when treating COVID-19 patients with inhalational anesthetics because of the adverse effects of the drugs [[4]Jerath A. Parotto M. Wasowicz M. Ferguson N.D. Volatile anesthetics. Is a new player emerging in critical care sedation?.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016; 193: 1202-1212Crossref PubMed Scopus (58) Google Scholar]. They are contraindicated in patients with malignant hyperthermia and can cause cardiovascular instability and respiratory depression [[4]Jerath A. Parotto M. Wasowicz M. Ferguson N.D. Volatile anesthetics. Is a new player emerging in critical care sedation?.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016; 193: 1202-1212Crossref PubMed Scopus (58) Google Scholar]. Whether long-term adverse effects result from prolonged drug treatment remains unknown. Finally, to mitigate adverse effects, the Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation (APSF) has developed guidelines for sedating COVID-19 patients with inhalational anesthetic drugs and recommendations for repurposing anesthetic gas machines as ICU ventilators [[5]American Society of Anesthesiologists, Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation. APSF/ASA guidance on purposing anesthesia machines as ICU ventilators. https://wwwasahqorg/in-the-spotlight/coronavirus-covid-19-information/purposing-anesthesia-machines-for-ventilators (Accessed April 2020).Google Scholar]. Clinical trials of COVID-19 patients are under development in Canada and elsewhere; however, until definitive data are available, care providers should consider the use of inhalational anesthetic drugs. These drugs reduce inflammation, dilate airways, and improve oxygenation and thus, may improve patient outcome. B.A.O., D.S.W. and W.Y.L. wrote the letter. B.A.O. is an inventor named on a Canadian patent (2852978), a US patent (9517265), and a pending US patent (62/268,137). D.S.W. and W.Y.L have no competing interests. Supported by a Foundation Grant (FDN-154312) from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (to B.A.O.).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEBioMedicineSame topicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersFrench-language works237,207