Sedating ventilated COVID-19 patients with inhalational anesthetic drugs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most patients with COVID-19 exhibit mild to moderate respiratory symptoms; however, some develop severe pneumonia and hypoxemia is a frequent cause of death. Severely ill COVID-19 patients often require endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. The choice of drugs to sedate these patients differs widely depending on drug availability and clinical expertise. We suggest that care providers with the appropriate clinical expertise, consider the use of inhalational anesthetic drugs, such as sevoflurane and isoflurane for the following reasons. Intensivists and anesthesiologists are teaming up to treat the sickest COVID-19 patients. They have reported that ventilated COVID-19 patients often require high doses of intravenous sedative drugs such as propofol, midazolam, ketamine and dexmedetomidine. Not surprisingly, there is a growing shortage of these drugs. Also, studies of patients with severe lung injury from causes other than COVID-19 have shown that inhalational anesthetic drugs improve oxygenation and lower mortality when compared with propofol or midazolam [[1]Jabaudon M. Boucher P. Imhoff E. Chabanne R. Faure J.S. Roszyk L. et al.Sevoflurane for sedation in acute respiratory distress syndrome. A randomized controlled pilot study.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017; 195: 792-800Crossref PubMed Scopus (99) Google Scholar]. The severity of lung injury in COVID-19 patients correlates with levels of cytokines and viral load. Convincing preclinical data from others and us have shown that inhalational anesthetic drugs attenuate lung inflammation and dilate airways [[2]Forkuo G.S. Nieman A.N. Kodali R. Zahn N.M. Li G. Rashid Roni M.S. et al.A novel orally available asthma drug candidate that reduces smooth muscle constriction and inflammation by targeting GABAA receptors in the lung.Mol Pharm. 2018; 15: 1766-1777Crossref PubMed Scopus (27) Google Scholar,[3]Fortis S. Spieth P.M. Lu W.Y. Parotto M. Haitsma J.J. Slutsky A.S. et al.Effects of anesthetic regimes on inflammatory responses in a rat model of acute lung injury.Intensive Care Med. 2012; 38: 1548-1555Crossref PubMed Scopus (48) Google Scholar]. These effects are mediated by γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptors, which are expressed in different types of cells in the lung. Stimulating GABAA receptors in lung epithelial cells reduces the production of proinflammatory cytokines; whereas activating GABAA receptors in airway smooth muscle cells stimulates bronchodilation and improves oxygenation [[2]Forkuo G.S. Nieman A.N. Kodali R. Zahn N.M. Li G. Rashid Roni M.S. et al.A novel orally available asthma drug candidate that reduces smooth muscle constriction and inflammation by targeting GABAA receptors in the lung.Mol Pharm. 2018; 15: 1766-1777Crossref PubMed Scopus (27) Google Scholar,[3]Fortis S. Spieth P.M. Lu W.Y. Parotto M. Haitsma J.J. Slutsky A.S. et al.Effects of anesthetic regimes on inflammatory responses in a rat model of acute lung injury.Intensive Care Med. 2012; 38: 1548-1555Crossref PubMed Scopus (48) Google Scholar]. The use of inhalational anesthetic drugs for ventilated COVID-19 patients is both practical and cost effective in low- and high-income countries. These drugs allow sedation levels to be closely and rapidly controlled [[4]Jerath A. Parotto M. Wasowicz M. Ferguson N.D. Volatile anesthetics. Is a new player emerging in critical care sedation?.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016; 193: 1202-1212Crossref PubMed Scopus (58) Google Scholar]; and drug administration does not require electronic infusion pumps, which are in short supply. Conventionally, anesthetic drug delivery units and gas scavenging systems that reduce atmospheric pollution are not available in most critical care units. However, operating rooms which contain the equipment, are being converted into critical care units and anesthetic gas machines are being used as ICU ventilators during the surge of COVID-19 cases [[5]American Society of Anesthesiologists, Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation. APSF/ASA guidance on purposing anesthesia machines as ICU ventilators. https://wwwasahqorg/in-the-spotlight/coronavirus-covid-19-information/purposing-anesthesia-machines-for-ventilators (Accessed April 2020).Google Scholar]. In non-operating room settings, less conventional devices including the AnaConDa system can be used to administer the drugs. Care providers must exercise caution and consult with anesthesiologists when treating COVID-19 patients with inhalational anesthetics because of the adverse effects of the drugs [[4]Jerath A. Parotto M. Wasowicz M. Ferguson N.D. Volatile anesthetics. Is a new player emerging in critical care sedation?.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016; 193: 1202-1212Crossref PubMed Scopus (58) Google Scholar]. They are contraindicated in patients with malignant hyperthermia and can cause cardiovascular instability and respiratory depression [[4]Jerath A. Parotto M. Wasowicz M. Ferguson N.D. Volatile anesthetics. Is a new player emerging in critical care sedation?.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016; 193: 1202-1212Crossref PubMed Scopus (58) Google Scholar]. Whether long-term adverse effects result from prolonged drug treatment remains unknown. Finally, to mitigate adverse effects, the Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation (APSF) has developed guidelines for sedating COVID-19 patients with inhalational anesthetic drugs and recommendations for repurposing anesthetic gas machines as ICU ventilators [[5]American Society of Anesthesiologists, Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation. APSF/ASA guidance on purposing anesthesia machines as ICU ventilators. https://wwwasahqorg/in-the-spotlight/coronavirus-covid-19-information/purposing-anesthesia-machines-for-ventilators (Accessed April 2020).Google Scholar]. Clinical trials of COVID-19 patients are under development in Canada and elsewhere; however, until definitive data are available, care providers should consider the use of inhalational anesthetic drugs. These drugs reduce inflammation, dilate airways, and improve oxygenation and thus, may improve patient outcome. B.A.O., D.S.W. and W.Y.L. wrote the letter. B.A.O. is an inventor named on a Canadian patent (2852978), a US patent (9517265), and a pending US patent (62/268,137). D.S.W. and W.Y.L have no competing interests. Supported by a Foundation Grant (FDN-154312) from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (to B.A.O.).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".