MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3016554950 · doi:10.5477/cis/reis.170.73

La división de los roles de género en las parejas en las que solo trabaja la mujer en Estados Unidos y España

2020· article· es· W3016554950 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas · 2020
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEmployment, Labor, and Gender Studies
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Population and Public Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Las parejas en las que solo trabaja la mujer son inusuales y representan una asignación atípica de roles en el hogar. El objetivo de este trabajo es estudiar las parejas en las que solo trabaja la mujer y su división de los roles de género en Estados Unidos y España. Este estudio revela que estas parejas son más igualitarias que otros tipos de parejas y que esta tipología de pareja ha cambiado significativamente en España, mientras que sus características permanecen más estables en Estados Unidos. Se observa una inversión en la brecha de género en Estados Unidos en cuanto al tiempo dedicado al trabajo doméstico. En España no hay inversión, y las mujeres siguen haciendo más tareas domésticas, incluso cuando son el único miembro empleado de la pareja.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.810
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it