Load Frequency Control of an Autonomous Microgrid Using Robust Fuzzy PI Controller
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes a robust load frequency control (LFC) strategy using a fuzzy logic-based PI controller for an autonomous hybrid microgrid with high renewable penetration. Such a high amount of renewable energy sources (RES) penetration replaces the contribution of diesel engine generators (DEGs), which intern reduces the system inertia as a result, microgrid (MG) experiences a frequency instability problem. Furthermore, the intermittent nature of the RES, load shedding and load restoring causes large frequency deviations which may weaken the MG and could lead to complete blackout. To solve the aforementioned problem, this work proposes an optimal coordinated control strategy between DEGs and SMES system for MG frequency control. Where this coordinated control strategy is based on the PI controller, which is optimally tuned by using a fuzzy logic approach. This proposed control strategy is tested on the BELLA-COOLA MG (in Canada), which was modelled in MATLAB/ Simulink. Finally, the simulation outcomes confirm the robustness and effectiveness of the proposed approach against all possible critical operational scenarios over various controllers in literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".