Identification of Novel Genes Associated with Cortical Thickness in Alzheimer’s Disease: Systems Biology Approach to Neuroimaging Endophenotype
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a common neurodegenerative disorder characterized by a heterogeneous distribution of pathological changes in the brain. Cortical thickness is one of the most sensitive imaging biomarkers for AD representing structural atrophy. The purpose of this study is to identify novel genes associated with cortical thickness. We measured the whole-brain mean cortical thickness from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans in 919 subjects from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative cohort, including 163 AD patients, 488 mild cognitive impairment patients, and 268 cognitively normal participants. Based on the single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based genome-wide association study, we performed gene-based association analysis for mean cortical thickness. Furthermore, we performed expression quantitative trait loci, protein-protein interaction network, and pathway analysis to identify biologically functional information. We identified four genes (B4GALNT1, RAB44, LOC101927583, and SLC26A10), two pathways (cyclin-dependent protein kinase holoenzyme complex and nuclear cyclin-dependent protein kinase holoenzyme complex), and one protein-protein interaction (B4GALNT1 and GALNT8 pair). These genes are involved in protein degradation, GTPase activity, neuronal loss, and apoptosis. The identified pathways are involved in the cellular processes and neuronal differentiation, which contribute to neuronal loss that is responsible for AD. Furthermore, the most significant SNP (rs12320537) in B4GALNT1 is associated with expression levels of B4GALNT1 in several brain regions. Thus, the identified genes and pathways provide deeper mechanistic insight into the molecular basis of brain atrophy in AD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".