MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Mucosal Thrombin Alters Gut Microbiota Biofilms Structure And Promote Dispersion Of Bacteria With Aggressive Behavior

2020· article· en· W3016633572 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jean‐Paul Motta, Simone Palese, David Sagnat, Laura Guiraud, Laurent Alric, Elisabetta Barocelli, Céline Deraison, Nathalie Vergnolle

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiofilmMicrobiologyBacteriaBiologyMucusIntestinal epitheliumEpitheliumMucinThrombinImmunologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alterations of gut microbiota have been implicated in a broad variety of intestinal diseases. The mechanisms whereby this may occur remains elusive. Gut mucosal microbiota is naturally organized as a polymicrobial biofilm, separated from the intestinal epithelium by a sterile mucus layer. We recently discovered that intestinal epithelium releases active thrombin, which plays a key role in segregation of intestinal biofilms from host tissue. Furthermore, we detected an upregulation of active thrombin in inflamed human patients and in models of colitis. Objectives Our study objective was to determine whether exposure to high thrombin, such as this occurring during inflammation, will alter commensal microbiota biofilms and promote the dispersion of bacteria predisposed to damage the intestinal epithelium. Methods Microbiota extracted from healthy human colon biopsies were seeded into the Calgary Biofilm Device and polystyrene coupons to develop, a multispecies anaerobic biofilm. Biofilms were exposed to various concentrations of thrombin (10 to 1000 Unit/ml). Dispersed bacteria released from thrombin‐treated biofilms were collected and their composition was assessed by 16S sequencing. These bacteria were apically exposed to human epithelial monolayers on transwells (Caco2 and HT29MTX). Adhesion (90 minutes), invasion (gentamicin assay, 3 hours) and translocation (4 hours) to basolateral side was quantified by plating on agar. Transwells were processed for fluorescent in situ hybridization for bacteria staining and phalloidin antibody for host cell cytoskeleton. Motility phenotype of biofilmdispersed bacteria was assessed on soft agarose gels (swarming and swimming). Mice (B6) were treated intracolonically with thrombin (5U per day for 10 days) or boiled thrombin (similar dose). Rats (Wistar) were treated with TNBS to induce colitis, and were treated for 3 days intracolonically with dabigatran (thrombin inhibitor, 1 μg/kg) or vehicle. Results Biofilm‐dispersed bacteria from thrombin‐treated biofilms attached more importantly to the epithelial monolayers compared to untreated biofilm. 3D reconstruction images confirmed such thrombin‐induced phenotype. Thrombin alters swarming and swimming motility in soft agarose gel. 16S analysis further precise the specific composition of biofilm‐dispersed bacteria after thrombin exposure. In mice, intrarectal administration of thrombin caused alterations of gut microbiota biofilms structure (16S sequencing) and organization ( in situ imaging of gut microbiota). During colitis in rats, local inhibition of thrombin activity prevented gut microbiota biofilms alterations associated with colitis (in situ imaging of gut microbiota and 16S analysis). Conclusions These data suggest that high concentration of thrombin released at gut mucosal surface during inflammation alters gut biofilm organization and modifies the phenotype of biofilm‐dispersed bacteria, which were able to invade and cross the epithelial barrier, thus increasing their likelihood to trigger inflammatory flares.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research→French-language works237,207→