Intelligent Spectrum Assignment Based on Dynamical Cooperation for 5G-Satellite Integrated Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The development of 5G-satellite integrated networks suffers from limited spectrum resources. In this paper, we investigate how to assign spectrum intelligently based on dynamical cooperation among primary users (PUs) and cognitive users (CUs) for 5G-satellite integrated networks. Firstly, we propose the cooperative transmission ability model. The effective time for users to communicate with satellites is formally measured. Based on this model, then, we formulate the intelligent spectrum assignment problem. Next, we propose the spectrum assignment mechanism PU4CU to maximize the throughput of CUs, including our random-based and greedy-based algorithms. Finally, we propose the stable matching-based cooperative spectrum assignment algorithm with the aim of maximizing the overall throughput, where CUs not only request spectrum from PUs but also transmit a part of the traffic of PUs. Extensive simulation results demonstrate that our three algorithms significantly improve spectrum utilization ratio and system performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it