Indy Dreams and Urban Nightmares: Speed Merchants, Spectacle and the Struggle over Public Space in the World-Class City. (Book Reviews/Comptes Rendus)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mark Douglas Lowes. Indy Dreams and Urban Nightmares: Speed Merchants, Spectacle and the Struggle over Public Space in the World-Class City. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2002. 148pp. When representatives from Molstar Sports and Entertainment approached the citizens and elected representatives of Vancouver's Hastings Park community, the plan to revitalize and Hastings Park was already in place. After years of political struggle, grass and trees were to replace the banality of concrete while a reconstructed riverbed was, once again, to provide vital spawning habitat for salmon. That Molstar wanted to relocate the Molson Indy Vancouver (MIV) to Hastings Park was not surprising. The park had been commercialized for generations, providing a home for the Pacific National Exhibition and thoroughbred horse racing, among other urban amenities. Yet, with the long sought after restoration ready to begin, Molstar's timing could not have been worse. Indy Dreams and Urban Nightmares explores the grass-roots resistance that erupted in the wake of Molstar's attempt to relocate MIV to Hastings Park. According to Lowes, the dedication and tenacity with which the Hastings community resisted, and eventually thwarted, Moistar's relocation bid speaks to a series of much larger social, political, and cultural dynamics. With its unparalleled emphasis on consumption overproduction, capitalism's contemporary state of flexible accumulation is reducing many urban centres to postmodern pseudo theme parks characterized by spectacle and nourished by the relentless commodification and sale of contemporary culture. The resistance offered by the Hastings community, therefore, speaks to the importance of exploring ...how urban public culture is defined and shaped by competition over the right to conceptualize, control, and experience public spaces (Lowes, 2002: 8). The relocation of the MIV to Hastings Park, argued Molstar, would place Vancouver on the world stage, infusing the wider community with much needed capital while providing the city with international reputability; accepting Molstar' s offer was, therefore, a matter of civic obligation. Yet, it was this ideological (and largely symbolic) relationship between the appropriation of urban space and questions about citizenship that permeated both sides of the debate. For those dedicated to the park's restoration, opposing Molstar's vision of urban spectacle and exclusionary space was a matter of civic obligation, a position that reflected the community of Hastings' belief in the importance of green space and the participation of citizens in the development of their own urban environment. According to Lowes, despite a lack of financial resources and labour power, the Hastings community successfully thwarted Molstar's relocation bid. Hastings' deep sense of community--which Lowes sees as emerging out of its young, middle class, and family-oriented population--provided the wherewithal needed to resist the further encroachment of modern capital and the spectacles it brings. Lowes' work is a fine piece of scholarship that speaks to the importance of re-theorizing urban space and its relationship to ideology, citizenship, identity, and the flows of power that surround its rhetorical and actual appropriation. Lowes traverses the macro and micro fields of research well, effectively connecting local events with national and/or global shifts in socio-political and economic ideology. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.043 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".