MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Prohibitin‐1 plays a multifaceted role in mediating luteinizing hormone‐induced steroidogenesis in Leydig cells.

2020· article· en· W3016671053 on OpenAlexaff
Geetika Bassi, Suresh Mishra

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal Regulation and Hypertension
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProhibitinCholesterol side-chain cleavage enzymeBiologySteroidogenic acute regulatory proteinMitochondrionInner mitochondrial membraneLuteinizing hormoneCell biologyCytochrome P450EndocrinologyInternal medicineChemistryBiochemistryHormoneEnzymeGene expressionGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Leydig cells (LCs) present in the interstitium between seminiferous tubules in the testis are responsible for the biosynthesis of testosterone from cholesterol in response to luteinizing hormone (LH) from the pituitary. The principal pathways of testosterone biosynthesis, the identities of the main steroidogenic enzymes, and genetic disorders of most of these enzymes have been elucidated. However, many important questions related to LH signaling and cholesterol transport remain unknown. For example, the mechanisms of StAR‐mediated cholesterol transport from the outer mitochondrial membrane to cytochrome P450 side chain cleavage (P450scc or Cyp11a1) enzyme in the inner mitochondrial membrane, which is a critical step in steroidogenesis, remain elusive. It is conceivable that we are missing some important players involved in this process. Prohibitin‐1 (PHB1) is a pleiotropic protein with cell compartment‐specific functions, including the phosphorylation‐dependent membrane signaling and mitochondrial chaperone, which appears to require heterodimerization with its homologous protein prohibitin‐2 (PHB2) in the inner mitochondrial membrane. Previously, we have reported transgenic mouse models expressing PHB1 (PHB‐Tg) or Y114F‐PHB1 (mPHB‐Tg) from the fatty acid binding protein‐4 ( Fabp4 ) gene promoter. During their phenotypic characterization, unexpectedly, we found that male mPHB‐Tg mice, but not PHB‐Tg mice, have high testosterone levels. Subsequent analysis revealed that it was due to leaky overexpression of m/PHB1 in LCs. This prompted us to investigate whether LH regulates PHB1 in LCs. A dose and time‐dependent effect of human chorionic gonadotropin, hCG (pituitary analog of LH) was found on PHB1 expression levels in LCs. To define the cell compartment‐specific role of PHB1 in LCs, we investigated the functional status of LH signaling in testes/LCs and ultrastructure of LCs from transgenic mice. A difference in phospho‐ERK levels was found between PHB‐Tg and mPHB‐Tg, which was higher in mPHB1 expressing cells. A similar effect was found in PHB1 manipulated MA‐10 cells (a model LC line). A parallel change in ultrastructural features of LCs (mitochondrial structure and lipid droplets) was found in PHB and mPHB overexpressing cells. Moreover, co‐immunoprecipitation experiments showed that PHB1 and PHB2 interact with P450scc and/or StAR. Analysis of PHBs protein sequences revealed the presence of multiple CRAC and/or CARC motifs (cholesterol recognition motifs) in both proteins. In aggregate, this finding suggests that PHB1 is a LH regulated protein in LCs and plays a multifaceted role in LH‐induced steroidogenesis, including ERK activation and potentially in the functional coupling of StAR and P450scc across mitochondrial membrane for steroidogenesis. The scope of our findings is broad because the basics of cholesterol transport across mitochondrial membranes are similar in different steroidogenic tissues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicHormonal Regulation and HypertensionFrench-language works237,207