MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3016710747 · doi:10.20383/101.023

Canadian Meteorological Centre’s Global Deterministic Prediction System Reforecasts (CGRF) / South West Nova Scotia (SWNS) ocean model setup

2018· article· en· W3016710747 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael P. Casey, Fatemeh Chegini, Anna Katavouta

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNetCDFMeteorologySnowNova scotiaClimatologyData archiveData filePrecipitationEnvironmental scienceForcing (mathematics)GeographyGeologyComputer scienceDatabaseOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Global atmospheric forcing data for the year 2010. Variables include: hourly wind fields at 10 m height (two components, file names starting with u10 and v10); air temperature at 2m (t2); humidity at 2m (q2); precipitation (precip); snowfall (snow); short-wave radiation (csw); and long-wave radiation (clw). Each tar.bz2 file is a monthly archive of daily netcdf files, one archive file for each variable and month of the year (e.g. "precip_y2010m09.tar.bz2" is the precipitation data for the 9th month of 2010). Setup files for SWNS model using NEMO v3.6 and ARIANE. The setup for NEMO model includes initial and boundary conditions and namelists. These setups are for three scenarios, i.e., Full run, Non-tidal run, and Barotropic run. The setup files for ARIANE include initial particle positions and namelist.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.188

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→Same topicClimate variability and models→French-language works237,207→