MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Examination of Cortactin‐ and Membrane‐Associated Proteins at <i>Listeria</i> Membrane Protrusions

2020· article· en· W3016723332 on OpenAlexaff
Kaitlin M. Bruzzini, Julian A. Guttman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrobial Metabolism and Applications
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCortactinCell biologyListeria monocytogenesMembrane rufflingIntracellularActinBiologyActin cytoskeletonCytoskeletonCellChemistryBacteriaBiochemistryGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Listeria monocytogenes is an intracellular pathogen that manipulates its host’s cytoskeleton to polymerize actin together with an array of actin‐associated proteins, including VASP and cortactin to one pole of the bacteria forming comet/rocket tails for intracellular propulsion. These structures also enable the microbes to move from one cell to another through a cell‐to‐cell spreading process involving the bacteria pressing into the host’s plasma membrane, forming L. monocytogenes protrusions which are internalized into corresponding invaginations in neighbouring cells. Recently, a siRNA screen listed genes involved in comet/rocket tail formation and cell‐to‐cell spreading. Here we examined a subset of those proteins (Endophilin, Ephrin A2, Anti‐Ephrin B1) as well as cortactin‐associated proteins (FGD1, SHK, VAV2) by immunolocalization at actin‐rich structures generated during L. monocytogenes infections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicMicrobial Metabolism and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207