MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Subcutaneous grafting of ovaries from newborn rabbits into adult ovariectomized mice does not result in normal folliculogenesis

2020· article· en· W3016760347 on OpenAlexaff
Dominik Valdez, Saúl Ruiz, Robert A. Foster, José R. Rodriguez‐Sosa

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFolliculogenesisOvaryBiologyOvariectomized ratFollicular phaseAndrologyTransplantationEndocrinologyInternal medicineOvarian follicleOogenesisEmbryoAnatomyOocyteCell biologyEmbryogenesisHormoneMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

About 10% (6.1 million) of women in the United States ages 15–44 have difficulty becoming pregnant or staying pregnant. About 1/3 are fertility problems in women. Abnormal ovarian function is a major contributor. A greater understanding of ovarian function and especially follicular development would improve treatment. Follicles form when germ cells arrive in the primitive sex cords, which are derived from the coelomic epithelium. In most species, these cords fragment and the germ cells become covered by precursors of the granulosa cells. Thus primordial follicles form. Pools of these follicles are eventually recruited and undergo maturation; a series of functional and morphological transformations that lead to ovulatory follicles. In species like humans, cattle and pigs, follicles form during the embryonic phase of gestation, while maturation takes place after birth. In contrast, both phases occur postnatally in rabbits and makes them an excellent model to study folliculogenesis. Laboratory studies using non‐rodent species are logistically more difficult and even prohibitive. One alternative is ovarian grafting into immunocompromised mice. When adult ovarian tissue is transplanted from large animals into mice, some primordial follicles survive and undergo maturation. We investigated the rabbit model by transplantation of immature rabbit ovaries under the dorsal skin of adult ovariectomized NCr N ude mice (1 ovary / mouse). At 4 – 5 weeks, growth of the grafted ovaries was evident. Macroscopically, 50% of the grafts (5/10) had one or two follicle‐like structures on their surface. Histologically the structures were cysts lined by cuboidal cells and contained cells with the germ cell phenotype. In conclusion, ovaries grafted subcutaneously from newborn rabbits into ovariectomized adult mice developed cystic primordial follicles. Normal follicle formation and maturation did not occur. Support or Funding Information Midwestern University intramural funds

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicReproductive Biology and Fertility→French-language works237,207→