High-Density Surface EMG Denoising Using Independent Vector Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High-density surface electromyography (HD-sEMG) can provide rich temporal and spatial information about muscle activation. However, HD-sEMG signals are often contaminated by power line interference (PLI) and white Gaussian noise (WGN). In the literature, independent component analysis (ICA) and canonical correlation analysis (CCA), as two popular used blind source separation techniques, are widely used for noise removal from HD-sEMG signals. In this paper, a novel method to remove PLI and WGN was proposed based on independent vector analysis (IVA). Taking advantage of both ICA and CCA, this method exploits the higher order and second-order statistical information simultaneously. Our proposed method was applied to both simulated and experimental EMG data for performance evaluation, which was at least 37.50% better than ICA and CCA methods in terms of relative root mean squared error and 28.84% better than ICA and CCA methods according to signal to noise ratio. The results demonstrated that our proposed method performed significantly better than either ICA or CCA. Specifically, the mean signal to noise ratio increased considerably. Our proposed method is a promising tool for denoising HD-sEMG signals while leading to a minimal distortion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".