MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Custom 3D Brain Cancer Model to Test a Novel Anti‐Cancer Electrotherapy

2020· article· en· W3016790313 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew Deweyert, Erin Iredale, Hu Xu, Eugene Wong, Susanne Schmid, Matthew O. Hebb

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neural Engineering
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpheroidMedicineMatrigelGliomaBioluminescence imagingOncologyCancerBiomedical engineeringElectrotherapyCancer researchInternal medicinePathologyCell cultureBiologyAngiogenesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction High‐Grade Gliomas (HGG) are primary malignant brain tumors with dismal treatment outcomes. Our team has been pioneering a novel implantable biotechnology called Intratumoral modulation therapy (IMT) that distributes non‐ablative electric fields across tumor‐affected brain regions to induce tumor cell death. A systematic means to define the mechanism and optimal treatment parameters for various forms of HGG is needed to advance this promising technology towards clinical application. The aim of this study was to develop a custom, high throughput, patient‐derived 3D HGG model to investigate the therapeutic effects of IMT. Methods Primary patient HGG cells (1×10 4 ) were implanted into wells of a 96‐well plate containing 200 uL of Matrigel®. The resultant tumor spheroids were characterized over 14 days by observing growth, invasion and viability with MTT assays, confocal microscopy and bioluminescence imaging (BLI). The culture plates were custom adapted to house implantable IMT devices to broadly distribute IMT fields across HGG tumors. Computer‐generated IMT field modeling was performed using COMSOL software to predict field strength and distribution, and to reconstruct IMT fields in the 3D system. Spheroids received 72‐hours of IMT using a spectrum of treatment parameters based upon a continuous, low amplitude sinusoidal waveform. Results Patient‐derived HGG spheroids exhibited multi‐layered, progressive growth and invasion of peritumoral matrix over the 14‐day study period. Computer simulation predicted electric field distribution and intensity across patient HGG spheroids for a spectrum of defined IMT parameters. Using the simulation plans to guide treatment settings, IMT produced a significant reduction (>60%) of metabolic viability in HGG spheroids treated with IMT compared to sham conditions. This data was corroborated by BLI which revealed >65% signal loss associated with IMT. Conclusion IMT is a highly promising innovation designed to combat HGGs, the most devastating of primary brain cancers. Our custom in vitro IMT model permits high throughput testing of treatment parameters in 3D patient HGG spheroids. This innovative preclinical strategy will be instrumental in defining the potential and optimizing treatment response across a spectrum of high fatality HGG cancers. Support or Funding Information This work was supported by the Cancer Research Society and preformed at Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry and Lawson Health Research Institute.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringFrench-language works237,207