L’expérience vécue de la nature : un levier pour transformer le politique dans un monde fini
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les éthiques environnementales et la théorie politique environnementale (TPE) ont eu pour projet de réfuter la conception anthropocentrée de l’éthique classique et de la théorie politique. Elles ont considéré que, seule, la reconnaissance de l’existence d’une valeur intrinsèque de la nature pouvait, entre autres, guider l’agir politique et déterminer les conditions d’une société définitivement soutenable et donc située dans les limites environnementales. Dans cet article, nous souhaitons explorer plus avant le recoupement entre les éthiques environnementales écocentrées et la TPE sur ce point précis que constitue la valeur intrinsèque de la nature. Notre hypothèse est que l’expérience vécue de la nature peut être un levier politique permettant de dépasser les dualismes traditionnels dans les systèmes de participation politique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.030 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".