Secure and Efficient Distributed Network Provenance for IoT: A Blockchain-Based Approach
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Network provenance is essential for Internet-of-Things (IoT) network administrators to conduct the network diagnostics and identify root causes of network errors. However, the distributed nature of the IoT network results in the management of the provenance data at different trust domains, which poses concerns on the security and trustworthiness of the cross-domain network diagnostics. In this article, we propose a blockchain-based architecture for secure and efficient distributed network provenance (SEDNP) in the IoT. Instead of directly storing and querying the whole provenance data on the blockchain with prohibitive implementation cost, we introduce a unified provenance query model and develop a provenance digest strategy that: 1) enables compact (constant size) on-blockchain digests of provenance data and a multilevel index regardless of provenance data volume and 2) ensures the correctness and integrity of provenance query results through the verification of the on-blockchain digests. We formally define the security requirements as Archiving Security along with thorough security analysis. Moreover, we conduct extensive experiments with the integration of a verifiable computation (VC) framework and a blockchain testing network. The experimental results are provided as performance benchmarks to demonstrate the application feasibility of SEDNP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it