Abstract B65: Mathematical modeling studies on spatial profiles of tumor-infiltrating T cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Activated cytotoxic T lymphocytes have been demonstrated to be able to kill antigen-specific cancer cells via various mechanisms. Not surprisingly, stronger infiltration of cytotoxic T cells into tumor/tumor-cell clusters generally associates with better prognosis, which has been demonstrated in various cancers. There have been efforts on quantifying the distribution of cytotoxic T cells on the whole tumor level. On the other hand, a solid tumor is usually composed of many tumor-cell clusters as well as stroma in gaps between those clusters. It has been noticed that T cells can be mostly localized in the stromal regions of a solid tumor. Therefore, it is also important to quantify the spatial pattern of T cells on the tumor-cell cluster level and further investigate the mechanism underlying the observed limited infiltration. In our work, we quantified the spatial distribution of CD8+ T cells with respect to their distance to the boundary of individual tumor-cell clusters. Generally, we observed that: i) patients differ in infiltration at the cluster level; ii) for most samples, T cells mainly accumulate outside the tumor-cell clusters; iii) for some samples T cells can effectively infiltrate the tumor-cell clusters; and iv) for other samples, the T-cell infiltration profile is intermediate. This last possibility reveals a non-monotonic distribution of T cells, i.e., a drop of T-cell density at the boundary coupled with a second accumulation of T cells at the center of tumor-cell clusters. Based on the quantified CD8+ T-cell profiles on the tumor-cell cluster level, we constructed mathematical models to test two hypothesized contributors affecting the spatial distribution of CD8+ T cells: a physical motility barrier set up by the ECM fibers in the stroma and a biochemical inhibitor ultimately due to the cancer cells inside the tumor-cell clusters. Mathematical models that only include physical barrier effects can qualitatively capture some (but not all) spatial features of the T-cell profiles. However, there is one significant shortcoming: the physical barrier scenario predicts that the profiles observed should be transient and hence eventually T cells should infiltrate all tumors. This appears inconsistent with simple time-scale estimates. A biochemical model focusing on T-cell repulsion can give rise to the observed spatial profiles as steady-state solutions; the different patterns correspond to different properties of cancer cells in different patients. We therefore favor this modeling framework. Of course, a definitive test would require experiments that would enable us to study the infiltration of T cells in a time-dependent manner or alternatively perturb possible mechanisms with drugs to directly test their effects on the infiltration pattern of T cells. Citation Format: Tina Gruosso, Morag Park, Herbert Levine, Xuefei Li. Mathematical modeling studies on spatial profiles of tumor-infiltrating T cells [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy; 2018 Nov 27-30; Miami Beach, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2020;8(4 Suppl):Abstract nr B65.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".