MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract B65: Mathematical modeling studies on spatial profiles of tumor-infiltrating T cells

2020· article· en· W3016847734 on OpenAlexaff
Tina Gruosso, Morag Park, Herbert Levine, Xuefei Li

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Immunology Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCytotoxic T cellTumor microenvironmentStromal cellInfiltration (HVAC)CD8T cellCellBiologyChemistryCancer researchAntigenImmune systemTumor cellsImmunologyMaterials scienceIn vitroBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Activated cytotoxic T lymphocytes have been demonstrated to be able to kill antigen-specific cancer cells via various mechanisms. Not surprisingly, stronger infiltration of cytotoxic T cells into tumor/tumor-cell clusters generally associates with better prognosis, which has been demonstrated in various cancers. There have been efforts on quantifying the distribution of cytotoxic T cells on the whole tumor level. On the other hand, a solid tumor is usually composed of many tumor-cell clusters as well as stroma in gaps between those clusters. It has been noticed that T cells can be mostly localized in the stromal regions of a solid tumor. Therefore, it is also important to quantify the spatial pattern of T cells on the tumor-cell cluster level and further investigate the mechanism underlying the observed limited infiltration. In our work, we quantified the spatial distribution of CD8+ T cells with respect to their distance to the boundary of individual tumor-cell clusters. Generally, we observed that: i) patients differ in infiltration at the cluster level; ii) for most samples, T cells mainly accumulate outside the tumor-cell clusters; iii) for some samples T cells can effectively infiltrate the tumor-cell clusters; and iv) for other samples, the T-cell infiltration profile is intermediate. This last possibility reveals a non-monotonic distribution of T cells, i.e., a drop of T-cell density at the boundary coupled with a second accumulation of T cells at the center of tumor-cell clusters. Based on the quantified CD8+ T-cell profiles on the tumor-cell cluster level, we constructed mathematical models to test two hypothesized contributors affecting the spatial distribution of CD8+ T cells: a physical motility barrier set up by the ECM fibers in the stroma and a biochemical inhibitor ultimately due to the cancer cells inside the tumor-cell clusters. Mathematical models that only include physical barrier effects can qualitatively capture some (but not all) spatial features of the T-cell profiles. However, there is one significant shortcoming: the physical barrier scenario predicts that the profiles observed should be transient and hence eventually T cells should infiltrate all tumors. This appears inconsistent with simple time-scale estimates. A biochemical model focusing on T-cell repulsion can give rise to the observed spatial profiles as steady-state solutions; the different patterns correspond to different properties of cancer cells in different patients. We therefore favor this modeling framework. Of course, a definitive test would require experiments that would enable us to study the infiltration of T cells in a time-dependent manner or alternatively perturb possible mechanisms with drugs to directly test their effects on the infiltration pattern of T cells. Citation Format: Tina Gruosso, Morag Park, Herbert Levine, Xuefei Li. Mathematical modeling studies on spatial profiles of tumor-infiltrating T cells [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy; 2018 Nov 27-30; Miami Beach, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2020;8(4 Suppl):Abstract nr B65.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.148
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Immunology ResearchSame topicImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesFrench-language works237,207