Intrapulmonary airway smooth muscle is hyperreactive with a distinct proteome in asthma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Constriction of airways during asthmatic exacerbation is the result of airway smooth muscle (ASM) contraction. Although it is generally accepted that ASM is hypercontractile in asthma, this has not been unambiguously demonstrated. Whether airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) is the result of increased ASM mass alone or also increased contractile force generation per unit of muscle directly determines the potential avenues for treatment.To assess whether ASM is hypercontractile we performed a series of mechanics measurements on isolated ASM from intrapulmonary airways and trachealis from human lungs. We analysed the ASM and whole airway proteomes to verify if proteomic shifts contribute to changes in ASM properties.We report an increase in isolated ASM contractile stress and stiffness specific to asthmatic human intrapulmonary bronchi, the site of increased airway resistance in asthma. Other contractile parameters were not altered. Principal component analysis (PCA) of unbiased mass spectrometry data showed clear clustering of asthmatic subjects with respect to ASM specific proteins. The whole airway proteome showed upregulation of structural proteins. We did not find any evidence for a difference in the regulation of myosin activity in the asthmatic ASM.In conclusion, we showed that ASM is indeed hyperreactive at the level of intrapulmonary airways in asthma. We identified several proteins that are upregulated in asthma that could contribute to hyperreactivity. Our data also suggest enhanced force transmission associated with enrichment of structural proteins in the whole airway. These findings may lead to novel directions for treatment development in asthma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".