Linear energy transfer dependence of transient yields in water irradiated by 150 keV – 500 MeV protons in the limit of low dose rates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
FLASH radiotherapy is a new irradiation method in which large doses of ionizing radiation are delivered to tumors almost instantly (a few milliseconds), paradoxically sparing healthy tissue while preserving anti-tumor activity. Although this technique is primarily studied in the context of electron and photon therapies, proton delivery at high dose rates can also reduce the adverse side effects on normal cells. So far, no definitive mechanism has been proposed to explain the differences in the responses to radiation between tumor and normal tissues. Given that living cells and tissues consist mainly of water, we set out to study the effects of high dose rates on the radiolysis of water by protons in the energy range of 150 keV – 500 MeV (i.e., for linear energy transfer (LET) values between ∼72.2 and 0.23 keV/μm, respectively) using Monte Carlo simulations. To validate our methodology, however, we, first, report here the results of our calculations of the yields (G values) of the radiolytically produced species, namely the hydrated electron ([Formula: see text]), • OH, H • , H 2 , and H 2 O 2 , for low dose rates. Overall, our simulations agree very well with the experiment. In the presence of oxygen, [Formula: see text] and H • atoms are rapidly converted into superoxide anion or hydroperoxyl radicals, with a well-defined maximum of [Formula: see text] at ∼1 μs. This maximum decreases substantially when going from low-LET 500 MeV to high-LET 150 keV irradiating protons. Differences in the geometry of the proton track structure with increasing LET readily explain this diminution in [Formula: see text] radicals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".