MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3016937660 · doi:10.7202/1068611ar

Papy, Jean avec Lambert Isebaert et Charles-Henri Nyns, éds. Le Collège des Trois Langues de Louvain, 1517–1797. Érasme, les pratiques pédagogiques humanistes et le nouvel institut des langues

2020· article· fr· W3016937660 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marie Barral‐Baron

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Linguistics and Language Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanitiesArtTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Papy, Jean avec Lambert Isebaert et Charles-Henri Nyns, éds. Le Collège des Trois Langues de Louvain, 1517–1797. Érasme, les pratiques pédagogiques humanistes et le nouvel institut des langues. Un article de la revue Renaissance and Reformation / Renaissance et Réforme (Gianfrancesco Pico della Mirandola (1469–1533): Faith, Antiquity, and the Witch Hunt) diffusée par la plateforme Érudit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.181

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.008
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance and ReformationSame topicHistorical Linguistics and Language StudiesFrench-language works237,207