MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The Structurally Unusual Retaining β‐Kdo Glycosyltransferase WbbB Uses a Double‐Displacement Mechanism with an Intermediate Adduct Rearrangement Step

2020· article· en· W3016977449 on OpenAlexaffabout
Matthew S. Kimber, Taylor J. B. Forrester, Evan Mallette, Olga G. Ovchinnikova, Jeremy T. Nothof, Akihiko Koizumi, Todd L. Lowary, Chris Whitfield

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryAdductStereochemistryAnomerResidue (chemistry)Biochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

WbbB is a modular, trifunctional glycosyltransferase (GT) which synthesizes lipopolysaccharide O‐antigen in Raoultella terrigena . The two C‐terminal WbbB GT domains build the polysaccharide repeat, while the N‐terminal GT domain acts as a terminator, adding a β‐Kdo (3‐deoxy‐d‐ manno ‐oct‐2‐ulosonic acid) residue to O3 to rhamnose as required for O‐antigen export. This N‐terminal GT domain is highly unusual in sequence and was not recognized as a GT by bioinformatics tools. The structure shows the dual Rossmann‐fold motifs characteristic of GT‐Bs, but with extensive deletions, insertions and rearrangements result in a unique architecture. The CMP‐binding site, however, retains motifs homologous to GT‐B sialyltransferases. WbbB is a retaining GT, transferring Kdo from the CMP‐®‐Kdo donor with net retention of anomeric configuration. All well‐characterized retaining GTs seem to employ a front‐side S N i substitution mechanism. This is somewhat surprising, as analogous retaining glycosyl hydrolases use a double‐displacement mechanism; here an essential catalytic acid residue attacks the donor saccharide to form a covalently bonded intermediate, with a second acidic residue acting as a general base to hydrolyse this adduct. We show, using mass spectrometry, that WbbB forms a Kdo adduct with Asp232 and its variants (D232N or D232C), while a D232A variant is both wholly inactive and forms no adduct. The x‐ray structure of D232N CMP‐®‐Kdo donor complex shows that the anomeric carbon of the donor is inaccessible to any potential acceptor but is instead positioned immediately in contact with, and in line with, the carboxylate of Asp232. Structures of D232N‐ and D232C‐Kdo adducts show that the Kdo adduct is rearranged into a second half‐site, interacting with a distinct set of catalytic residues. A ternary complex of D232C‐Kdo plus a synthetic acceptor shows that Glu158 forms direct hydrogen bonds with O3 of rhamnose, positioned adjacent to and in‐line with the anomeric carbon of Kdo, activating it for attack. Glu158 is also essential, with variants being wholly inactive. Together, this shows that WbbB uses a glycosyl hydrolase‐like double‐displacement mechanism. We propose that crowding around the anomeric carbon by the carboxylate group likely precludes retaining ulosonic acid transferases using the more straightforward S N i mechanism, while adduct rearrangement avoids having the acceptor compete with the leaving nucleotide for access to the anomeric carbon of the donor. Support or Funding Information This work was funded by an NSERC Discovery grant (04045‐2015) to MSK and support from the Canadian Glycomics Network (SD‐1) to TLL; TJBF is the recipient of a University of Guelph Graduate Excellence Entrance Scholarship and an Ontario Graduate Scholarship.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research→French-language works237,207→