MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3016978049 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2019-0578

Identification of a vibrationally excited level in methyl formate through microwave and far-infrared spectroscopy

2020· article· en· W3016978049 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Kaori Kobayashi, Yusuke Sakai, Masaharu Fujitake, D. W. Tokaryk, Brant Billinghurst, Nobukimi Ohashi

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMolecular Spectroscopy and Structure
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)University of SaskatchewanUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsotopologueExcited statePhysicsRotational spectroscopyMethyl formateAtomic physicsSpectral lineFar infraredGround stateSpectroscopyMicrowaveRotational transitionOpticsChemistryAngular momentumAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Methyl formate (HCOOCH3) is an important interstellar molecule. More than 1000 rotational transitions including those from the ground state, torsionally excited states, and of its isotopologues have been observed towards several astrophysical sources. The laboratory spectra of methyl formate in the microwave spectral region contain many unassigned transitions and many of them are likely to be due to rotational transitions in the low-lying excited states. We report the laboratory identification of new rotational transitions in the COC deformation (ν12) excited state. The identification was made possible by combining the microwave data with rotation–vibration spectra taken in the far-infrared region at the Canadian Light Source synchrotron.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicMolecular Spectroscopy and StructureFrench-language works237,207