The dermoscopic pattern of blue nevi involving the nail apparatus
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Recent experimental data suggest a role for apremilast in the treatment of alopecia areata. Small clinical studies have so far provided contradictory results. Objectives: We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of apremilast in five cases of extensive and treatment-resistant alopecia areata. Materials and Methods: Apremilast was given at a dose of 30 mg, twice daily, over six months. The efficacy of apremilast treatment was determined by monthly assessment of the affected scalp surface area using SALT scoring. Results: In four out of five patients, no sustained improvement in SALT score was observed within the treatment period. Two of these patients had a slight but only transient improvement after two months of treatment. One patient responded to apremilast treatment with a progressive and marked improvement, as reflected by an 83% reduction in SALT score. Conclusion: Our results are in line with the varying treatment responses in previous studies. Future studies on the efficacy of apremilast treatment in confirmed alopecia areata patient groups are warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it