MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The absence of Lamp2 triggers autophagy and mitochondrial biogenesis in skeletal muscle

2020· article· en· W3017004323 on OpenAlexaff
Avigail T. Erlich, Paul Säftig, Sebastian Held, David A. Hood

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutophagy in Disease and Therapy
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMitophagyAutophagyCell biologyLysosomeMitochondrionAutophagosomeChemistryLAMP1BiogenesisBiologyIntracellularEndosomeBiochemistryEnzymeApoptosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Skeletal muscle requires functional mitochondria to provide it with its energy needs. The quality of the organelle is dependent on the synthesis of new mitochondria and the degradation of those that are no longer operative, via the mitophagy pathway. Current research is examining mitophagy impairments at the autophagosome level, yet little is known about the degradation of the organelle at the level of the lysosome. Dysfunctional mitochondria produce high amounts of ROS and have a lower membrane potential, targeting them for degradation. Tagged mitochondria are engulfed in autophagosomes, which then fuse with lysosomes containing hydrolytic enzymes. The fusion of the lysosome and autophagosome is mediated by the lysosomal protein Lamp2, and is essential for the final stage of mitophagy. The purpose of this project is to evaluate the consequences of Lamp2 deficiency on mitochondrial and lysosomal proteins, as well as potential compensatory signaling responses within muscle. Gastrocnemius and quadriceps muscles of Lamp2 KO mice, compared to WT mice, were used for western blotting and enzymatic analyses. Lamp2 KO mice exhibited a significant 1.4‐fold increase in the adapter protein p62, responsible for tethering the autophagosome to the dysfunctional cargo. Similarly, the LC3‐II to LC3‐I ratio was increased by 2.4‐fold in mice lacking Lamp2. COX activity, a measurement of mitochondrial content, was also elevated by 1.3‐fold in KO mice compared to WT counterparts. These results suggest that the absence of Lamp2 leads to an accumulation of autophagosomes containing mitochondria that are not properly degraded. Protein levels of Beclin1 and the E3 ubiquitin ligase Parkin, were augmented in KO mice, possibly in an attempt increase signaling towards autophagosome formation, and the targeting of dysfunctional mitochondria. TFEB, the master regulator of lysosomal and autophagy genes, was increased 2.2‐fold in KO mice compared to WT animals. Interestingly, mTOR phosphorylation was also increased 2‐fold in KO mice. This activation of mTOR suggests that the elevated TFEB levels are largely confined to the cytosol, and may be less transcriptionally active. However, a downstream target of TFEB, Cathepsin D was increased in KO mice, but no changes were observed in the lysosomal marker V‐ATPase between genotypes. PGC‐1a, the master regulator of mitochondrial biogenesis was elevated by 1.8‐fold in the KO mice, suggesting increased signaling towards mitochondrial biogenesis. However, levels of Transcription factor A (Tfam) were similar between genotypes, suggesting that the absence of Lamp2 may dysregulate the coordinated expression of nuclear and mtDNA encoded gene products. This was evident from an increase in UQCRC2, a nuclear‐derived protein, with no changes observed in mtDNA encoded COXI. Thus, these data suggest that Lamp2 is required for the clearance of mitochondria. In its absence, mitochondrial degradation is defective, initiating compensatory signaling responses to mitochondrial biogenesis and autophagy induction to promote mitochondrial turnover and the reestablishment of a high quality mitochondrial pool.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicAutophagy in Disease and TherapyFrench-language works237,207