MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3017015149 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.2988445

UAV-Assisted Emergency Communications in Social IoT: A Dynamic Hypergraph Coloring Approach

2020· article· en· W3017015149 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Bowen Wang, Yanjing Sun, Zhi Sun, Long D. Nguyen, Trung Q. Duong

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChina University of Mining and TechnologyQueen's UniversityNewton FundNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaDepartment for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, UK GovernmentQueen's University BelfastRoyal Academy of Engineering
KeywordsComputer scienceMulticastDisseminationComputer networkDistributed computingNetwork packetHypergraphTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, we address the social-awareness property and unmanned-aerial-vehicle (UAV)-assisted information diffusion in emergency scenarios, where UAVs can disseminate alert messages to a set of terrestrial users within their coverage, and then these users can continuously disseminate the received data packets to their socially connected users in a device-to-device (D2D) multicast manner. In this regard, we have to solve both the dynamic cluster formation and spectrum sharing problems in stochastic environments, since both UAVs and terrestrial users may arrive or depart suddenly. For the cluster formation problem, considering that the data rate of a multicast cluster is determined by the member with the worst link condition, we formulate it as a many-to-one matching game and adopt the rotation-swap algorithm to maximize the expected number of users receiving the alerting messages in each time slot. For the dynamic spectrum sharing problem, aiming at eliminating the interference while minimizing the channel switching cost, we propose a dynamic hypergraph coloring approach to model the cumulative interference and maintain the mutual interference at a low level by exploring a small number of vertices, when the graph is dynamically updated, i.e., the insertion/deletion of vertex/edge. Moreover, we prove some crucial properties, including global stability, convergence, and complexity. Finally, simulation results show that our proposed approach can achieve a better tradeoff among the information diffusion speed, channel switch cost, and complexity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicUAV Applications and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207