MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3017048440 · doi:10.1002/csc2.20162

Characterizing resistance to soybean cyst nematode in PI 494182, an early maturing soybean accession

2020· article· en· W3017048440 on OpenAlexaff
Vincent Thomas Boucher St-Amour, Benjamin Mimee, Davoud Torkamaneh, Martine Jean, François Belzile, Louise S. O’Donoughue

Bibliographic record

VenueCrop Science · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicNematode management and characterization studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphUniversité LavalGrain Research CentreAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoybean cyst nematodeBiologyQuantitative trait locusHeteroderaGeneticsPopulationLocus (genetics)GenotypingAlleleGeneGenotypeNematode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The soybean cyst nematode (SCN) ( Heterodera glycines Ichinohe) generates more damage to soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] than any other parasite in most soybean‐producing countries. The use of SCN‐resistant cultivars remains the most effective method to limit losses caused by SCN. The SCN‐resistant accession PI 88788 has been used almost exclusively to control SCN over the past decades, inducing a shift in nematode virulence to overcome the resistance. Furthermore, PI 88788 and other sources of resistance characterized to date belong to maturity groups (MGs) III and higher, making them less attractive to develop early maturing soybean varieties (MGs 0‐000). In this work, we performed a quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis of the SCN‐resistant soybean accession PI 494182 (MG 0). A recombinant inbred lines (RILs) population (‘Costaud’ × PI 494182) segregating for SCN resistance was challenged with SCN ( H. glycines [HG] type 0) and genotyped via genotyping‐by‐sequencing (GBS) to produce a genetic map. Six resistance QTL were identified, including a potentially new resistance locus on chromosome 07. A subset of the RIL population was confronted to a HG type 2.5.7 SCN population and some of these exhibited resistance toward this type. Whole‐genome sequencing of PI 494182 and Costaud allowed us to determine the alleles and their copy number for three candidate genes: GmSNAP11 , GmSNAP18 ( Rhg1 ), and GmSHMT08 ( Rhg4 ). Finally, we determined that selecting for PI 494182 alleles at some SCN‐resistance QTL could entail linkage drag (decrease in protein concentration and 100‐seed weight, increase in oil concentration). This work provides useful markers for introgressing SCN resistance in early maturing soybean varieties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score0.539

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCrop ScienceSame topicNematode management and characterization studiesFrench-language works237,207