MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3017050960 · doi:10.4000/books.ifp.4779

9. Women’s survival strategies and experiences with support services as home-based micro-entrepreneurs in Metro Manila

2005· book-chapter· en· W3017050960 on OpenAlexaff
Christine Bonnin

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitut Français de Pondichéry eBooks · 2005
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Ethnicity, and Economy
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the informalisation of labour markets increases globally, so too has women’s participation in them (Chen 2001). Though offering a source of livelihood, informal work is fraught with conditions of insecurity, economic growth stagnancy, below minimum wages, poor working environments and long hours (Joshi 1997). In the context of the Philippines, a combination of local and global factors has contributed to the abundance of the informal economy. The colonial legacy of landlessness and rapid u...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitut Français de Pondichéry eBooksSame topicMigration, Ethnicity, and EconomyFrench-language works237,207