MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Induction And Regulation of Endogenous DARC Expression in Primary Human Endothelial Cells

2020· article· en· W3017116690 on OpenAlexaffabout
Negar Khosraviani, Nikki Zamani Farahani, Madlene Abramian, Changsen Wang, Warren L. Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSignaling Pathways in Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemokineCell biologyBiologyEndotheliumEndothelial stem cellReceptorChemokine receptorImmunologyEndogenyIn vivoMolecular biologyIn vitroInflammationGeneticsBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines (DARC, also known as atypical chemokine receptor 1) is a blood group antigen associated with susceptibility to the parasite causing malaria. Despite homology to other chemokine receptors, DARC lacks the intracellular DRY motif present on most G‐protein‐coupled receptors that is required for signaling. Human biopsy and animal studies have indicated the presence of DARC on the endothelium of post‐capillary venules where its function and regulation are unclear. The lack of literature on endothelial DARC is attributed in part to the fact that its expression disappears in cultured endothelial cells within hours of isolation from tissue. Thus, almost all studies on endothelial DARC have required in vivo approaches. However, while the in vivo work is intriguing, the ability to study endogenous endothelial DARC in vitro will be necessary to elucidate its regulation and true physiologic function. We have discovered that incubation with human whole blood for 24 hours leads to induction of DARC on cultured primary human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells (HPMEC). DARC induced in this manner is appropriately targeted to the cell surface, as it renders endothelial cells sensitive to an extracellular leukocidin. Induction of DARC on the endothelium was sensitive to cycloheximide, implicating de novo protein synthesis, and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays for RNA polymerase II also confirm transcription of the gene. While exposure to whole blood for 24 hours induced endogenous endothelial DARC expression, exposure to plasma had no effect. Transwell experiments indicated that physical contact with cellular elements in blood was necessary for induction of DARC. After induction of DARC and removal of blood, we observed rapid loss of DARC protein and mRNA within 24 hours. Our preliminary experiments suggest that endothelial DARC is rapidly degraded at least in part by matrix metalloproteinases. In conclusion, DARC expression on endothelial cells is regulated by cues from the microenvironment. DARC may play an important role in the immune system and its regulation is likely to have implications for our understanding of how cultured cells maintain or lose their in situ tissue phenotype. Support or Funding Information This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) grant to W.L.L., and N.K. was supported by the Canadian Graduate Scholarship ‐ Master’s Program (CGS‐M).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicSignaling Pathways in DiseaseFrench-language works237,207