MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3017165981 · doi:10.1139/cjce-2019-0515

Bench to full-scale enhanced primary treatment of municipal wastewater under wet weather flow for minimized pollution load: evaluation of chemical addition and process control indicators

2020· article· en· W3017165981 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Mirna Alameddine, Abdul Rahim Al Umairi, Mohammed Zakee Shaikh, Mohamed Gamal El‐Din

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Stormwater Management Solutions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlumTurbidityFlocculationChemical oxygen demandTotal suspended solidsWastewaterEnvironmental scienceSuspended solidsMixing (physics)Pulp and paper industryEnvironmental engineeringSewage treatmentCoagulationPollutionChemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The enhanced primary treatment of municipal primary influent under wet weather conditions was studied through a comprehensive approach from bench to full scale. The study delivered a practical solution for managing seasonal fluctuations in the influent wastewater by determining the most effective operation conditions for coagulation–flocculation. Three metal-based coagulants were tested through a series of jar tests. Alum outperformed other coagulants since 1 mg of Al added as alum with low mixing was able to remove 22 NTU, 19 mg COD, and 0.8 mg ortho-P. Three-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated that total suspended solids (TSS) removal depended mostly on rapid mixing while chemical oxygen demand (COD) and ortho-P removals depended on slow mixing and coagulant dose. In bench and full-scale operations, the addition of polymer did not lead to any pronounced improvements. Finally, turbidity and percent ultraviolet transmittance showed good correlation with TSS and ortho-P, which evokes their use as surrogates for micropollutants removal and online process control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score0.381

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicUrban Stormwater Management SolutionsFrench-language works237,207