The prevalence and prognostic significance of estrogen receptor beta expression in non-small cell lung cancer
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Estrogen receptor beta (ERβ) is the predominant estrogen receptor (ER) expressed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, due to methodological disparities among prior studies, the prognostic value of ERβ expression in NSCLC remains unclear. Our objective was to apply improved detection and analysis techniques to assess the prognostic value of ERβ expression in NSCLC. METHODS: A tissue microarray (TMA) was used which contained resected and biopsy specimens from 299 patients diagnosed at a single center with stages I-IV NSCLC. Sections of this array were stained using high-sensitivity fluorescence immunohistochemistry, with the well-validated PPG5/10 monoclonal antibody. Digital images of the stained array slides were analyzed using software-based image analysis, which reported ERβ expression as a continuous variable in different subcellular domains. RESULTS: There were no differences in ERβ expression between male and female patients. High expression of ERβ was not a prognostic factor, but was significantly associated with stage IV disease in both tumor and stroma (P<0.001). In multivariable analysis, a high nuclear/cytoplasmic (N/C) ratio of ERβ expression was significantly associated with shorter overall survival, based on expression in the tumor [hazard ratio (HR): 1.65; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.25-2.19; P<0.001] and in the stroma (HR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.16-2.12; P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that subcellular localization of ERβ, but not absolute expression, is a prognostic factor in NSCLC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it