MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3017169857 · doi:10.1201/9781003072430-22

Burnout and Coping Strategies: A Comparative Study of Ward Nurses

2020· book-chapter· en· W3017169857 on OpenAlexaff
E. Dara Ogus

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHealth and Well-being Studies
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBurnoutPsychologyCoping (psychology)Clinical psychologyCoping behaviorApplied psychologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Burnout in large organizations has been examined in a number of studies. Frequent use of maladaptive coping behaviours combined with a highly stressed ward environment may be leading ward nurses into a spiral that places them at a higher risk for burnout. Patient load may also be a factor contributing to coping style and burnout levels. Burnout is distinct from occupational stress in that it involves three components. This chapter examines burnout and coping strategies among medical and surgical ward nurses. It was hypothesized that nurses using high levels of negative pallialive coping would experience higher burnout than nurses using palliative coping minimally. Patient load may also be a factor contributing to coping style and burnout levels. When surgical beds are filled, the overflow is often placed in medical units until appropriate space can be found.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHealth and Well-being StudiesFrench-language works237,207