Joint User Pairing and Association for Multicell NOMA: A Pointer Network-based Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we investigate the joint user pairing and association problem for multicell non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) systems. We consider a scenario where the user equipments (UEs) are located in a multicell network equipped with multiple base stations. Each base station has multiple orthogonal physical resource blocks (PRBs). Each PRB can be allocated to a pair of UEs using NOMA. Each UE has the additional freedom to be served by any one of the base stations, which further increases the complexity of the joint user pairing and association algorithm design. Leveraging the recent success on using machine learning to solve numerical optimization problems, we formulate the joint user pairing and association problem as a combinatorial optimization problem. The solution is found using an emerging deep learning architecture called Pointer Network (PtrNet), which has a lower computational complexity compared to solutions based on iterative algorithms and has been proven to achieve near-optimal performance. The training phase of the PtrNet is based on deep reinforcement learning (DRL), and does not require the use of the optimal solution of the formulated problem as training labels. Simulation results show that the proposed joint user pairing and association scheme achieves near-optimal performance in terms of the aggregate data rate, and outperforms the random user pairing and association heuristic by up to 30%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".