MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Mitochondrial function after bisphenol S exposure: a safe substitute for BPA?

2020· article· en· W3017223762 on OpenAlexaffabout
Radha Dutt Singh, Sarah Easson, Jennifer Thompson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReactive oxygen speciesAndrologyMitochondrial ROSMitochondrionOxidative stressBisphenol SChemistryStainingMolecular biologyBiologyBisphenol ABiochemistryMedicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective Bisphenol A (BPA) is one of the most common industrial chemicals, detected in the urine of 93 percent of US adults. BPA was declared a toxic substance in 2010 and has been linked to metabolic and cardiovascular disease. Amid growing consumer concern, manufacturers increasingly turned to BPA substitutes, the most common of which is bisphenol S (BPS); however, its safety was not determined before introduction to market. Thus, exposure to BPS is on the rise; but its health effects are unclear. Our aim was to determine the impact of BPS exposure on mitochondrial dynamics in vascular smooth muscle cells. Methods Vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) were isolated by enzymatic digestion from the thoracic aorta of juvenile (6–7 week old) male C56BL/6 mice. Cells were cultured in DMEM/F12 media supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin‐streptomycin. At 70–80% confluency, cells were treated with vehicle (DMSO) or variable doses of BPS [2.5nM (levels in drinking water); 250nM (permissible limit) and 25μM]. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels from cellular and mitochondrial sources were determined by 2′,7′‐dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCFDA) and MitoSOX staining, respectively. Membrane integrity was assessed by evaluating mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) by JC1 staining. Mitochondrial fragmentation was measured by MitoTracker Red CMXROS staining and confocal microscopy. Real‐time PCR will be used to measure the expression of genes involved in mito‐fission and fussion and mitochondrial DNA copy number. Results After 30 min and 1 hr of BPS exposure, cellular and mitochondrial ROS levels were increased in a dose‐dependent manner, with a more prominent increase at 1 hr (all doses p<0.001). At 1, 12 and 24 hrs after exposure, mitochondrial depolarization was observed at all doses. At 24 hours, the reduction in mitochondrial membrane potential was greatest at the lowest dose (3‐fold vs. vehicle, p<0.0001). MitoTracker Red CMXROS revealed significant mitochondrial fragmentation at 24 hrs after exposure to 25μM BPS. Conclusion Mitochondrial function is disrupted in VSMCs exposed to BPS at doses lower than the permissible limit and equivalent to human exposure. Studies are underway to determine the mechanistic basis of BPS‐induced mitochondrial dysfunction and long‐term effects on vascular health. Support or Funding Information This study was supported the CIHR, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, and a Kertland Fellowship.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals→French-language works237,207→