MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Alegorias de Brasília: narrativas históricas sobre as capitais brasileiras

2020· article· pt· W3017234839 on OpenAlexaff
Maria Fernanda Derntl

Bibliographic record

VenueParanoá cadernos de arquitetura e urbanismo · 2020
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Development and Societal Issues
Canadian institutionsCanadian Historical Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesBusinessArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neste artigo, um dos tópicos das narrativas históricas sobre Brasília – a evocação das anteriores capitais Salvador e Rio de Janeiro – é o mote para retomar a formação inicial de cada uma delas e destacar distintas noções de capitalidade no Brasil entre os séculos 16 e 20. A partir da retomada da bibliografia e de uma seleção de documentos a respeito de Salvador, Rio de Janeiro e Brasília, o artigo busca destacar as especificidades de sua concepção e, ao fim, questionar a noção de suposta continuidade histórica entre elas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.183
Threshold uncertainty score0.365

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueParanoá cadernos de arquitetura e urbanismoSame topicUrban Development and Societal IssuesFrench-language works237,207