[(FeCoB/Ru/FeCoB)/ZnO]n superlattice multilayer: A real optical mode ferromagnetic resonance thick-film
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A pure optical mode (OM) resonance with ultrahigh resonance frequency (frO) and permeability μ at zero bias field was observed in 50-nm FeCoB/Ru/FeCoB sandwich trilayers due to the presence of strong antiferromagnetic interlayer exchange coupling. However, the necessary thickness for creating practical microwave devices cannot be readily achieved by increasing the FeCoB layer thickness or stacking FeCoB/Ru units due to dramatically deteriorated high-frequency performance. In this study, several 50-nm FeCoB/Ru/FeCoB OM units were stacked to form a superlattice structure, with 10-nm ZnO insulator spacers separating the units. It is interesting that the superlattice multilayers not only retain excellent high-frequency OM resonance performance comparable to the single OM unit but also increase the effective magnetic film thickness by a factor of 5. This can be attributed to the positive superposition of the almost identical OM units as well as the effective decoupling between them by thick ZnO spacers. This study provides a promising way to fabricate thicker films while still maintaining excellent OM resonance performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".