MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3017275225 · doi:10.1007/s12192-020-01097-x

Structural and functional properties of proteins interacting with small heat shock proteins

2020· review· en· W3017275225 on OpenAlexaff
Afrooz Dabbaghizadeh, Robert M. Tanguay

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Stress and Chaperones · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHeat shock proteins research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeat shock proteinBiologyHSPA12ACell biologyChaperone (clinical)Protein foldingBiochemistryHeat shockGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Small heat shock proteins (sHsps) are ubiquitous molecular chaperones found in all domains of life, possessing significant roles in protein quality control in cells and assisting the refolding of non-native proteins. They are efficient chaperones against many in vitro protein substrates. Nevertheless, the in vivo native substrates of sHsps are not known. To better understand the functions of sHsps and the mechanisms by which they enhance heat resistance, sHsp-interacting proteins were identified using affinity purification under heat shock conditions. This paper aims at providing some insights into the characteristics of natural substrate proteins of sHsps. It seems that sHsps of prokaryotes, as well as sHsps of some eukaryotes, can bind to a wide range of substrate proteins with a preference for certain functional classes of proteins. Using Drosophila melanogaster mitochondrial Hsp22 as a model system, we observed that this sHsp interacted with the members of ATP synthase machinery. Mechanistically, Hsp22 interacts with the multi-type substrate proteins under heat shock conditions as well as non-heat shock conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCell Stress and ChaperonesSame topicHeat shock proteins researchFrench-language works237,207