MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The Deletion of AMPK β1 Worsens Glucose Tolerance and Liver Lipid Accumulation, but Doesn’t Impact the Metabolic Effects of Olanzapine in Male Mice

2020· article· en· W3017314353 on OpenAlexaffabout
Hesham Shamshoum, Kristen E. Ashworth, Kyle D. Medak, Bruce E. Kemp, David C. Wright

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet and metabolism studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAMPKEndocrinologyAMP-activated protein kinaseInternal medicineWeight gainOlanzapineProtein kinase AAtypical antipsychoticBiologyAntipsychoticMedicineChemistryKinaseSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)BiochemistryBody weight

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Second generation antipsychotic (SGA) medications, like olanzapine (OLZ), are an important component in the pharmacological management of many conditions including schizophrenia. These drugs, have been linked with a neuroendocrine signaling axis that, leads to weight gain, however, peripheral mechanisms and predictors are currently poorly understood. 5’AMP activated protein kinase (AMPK) is a ubiquitously expressed, energy‐sensing enzyme and significant associations between polymorphisms in AMPK subunit genes and OLZ‐induced weight gain have been demonstrated. Conversely, others have suggested that the central activation of AMPK mediates the deleterious metabolic effects of SGAs. The purpose of this study was to determine if reductions in AMPK activity, primarily in the liver, would impact the chronic effects of OLZ treatment. We hypothesized that the absence of AMPK β1, a subunit which is primarily found in the liver, at least in mice, would worsen the metabolic side effects of OLZ. To address this question, we housed male AMPK β1 knockout (KO) and wildtype (WT) mice at thermoneutrality (29°C) and fed them either a control diet (HFD, 45% kcal from fat) or a diet supplemented with OLZ (HFD+OLZ, 50mg/kg diet) for 10 weeks. OLZ treatment did not increase food intake or weight gain to a greater extent than the control diet in either genotype. There was a main effect of the OLZ containing diet to increase heat production, TEE and fat oxidation during the light and dark cycles. The OLZ‐fed mice also demonstrated suppressed RER during the dark cycle. Interestingly, the OLZ‐fed KO mice were more physically active during the light cycle than the OLZ‐fed WT mice. The AMPK β1 KO mice were more glucose intolerant than the WT control mice. On the other hand, the AMPK β1 KO male mice on both diets demonstrated lower circulating serum glycerol and NEFA levels but increased liver TAG accumulation. In conclusion, our findings provide evidence that the absence of AMPK β1 does not potentiate the effects of OLZ on weight gain, but worsens liver lipid accumulation and glucose tolerance. Support or Funding Information This study was supported by Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicDiet and metabolism studies→French-language works237,207→