MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3017318545 · doi:10.3390/s20082300

A New Construction of High Performance LDPC Matrices for Mobile Networks

2020· article· en· W3017318545 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSensors · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicError Correcting Code Techniques
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLow-density parity-check codeComputer scienceAdditive white Gaussian noiseComputationAlgorithmDecoding methodsData flow diagramChannel (broadcasting)Theoretical computer scienceComputer engineeringComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Secure and reliable information flow is one of the main challenges in social IoT and mobile networks. Information flow and data integrity is still an open research problem. In this paper, we develop new methods of constructing systematic and regular Low-Density Parity-Check Matrices (LDPCM), inspired by the structure of the Sarrus method and geometric designs. Furthermore, these codes have cyclic structure and therefore, are less complex in computation and also require less memory in hardware implementation. Besides, an optimal method of post-processing for deleting girths four is presented. Numerical results show that the codes constructed by these methods perform well over the additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel when decoded with the sum-product LDPC iterative algorithms. The proposed methods can be very efficient in terms of reducing memory consumption and improving the convergence speed of the decoder particularly in IoT and mobile networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.818
Threshold uncertainty score0.346

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it